Head of HR, Termigas Bergamo
Leadership is often described through decisions, authority and personal conviction. For Rashid Ahmed, its more enduring measure is what happens to other people: whether they gain the clarity, confidence and capability to perform without dependence. In this conversation with The Leadership Gazette, Ahmed discusses the balance between empathy and accountability, the business case for continuous learning and the capabilities leaders will need in an AI-shaped workplace.
Learning culture starts with leadership behaviour, not an L&D calendar.
I would focus on five actions:
Make learning part of the job, not an additional task. Give employees the time, tools and opportunities to learn while working.
Make managers learning multipliers. Managers should coach, give feedback, conduct meaningful development conversations and create stretch opportunities.
Move from course-centric to capability-centric learning. Start with the business capability required, then determine whether the solution is training, coaching, technology, job rotation, mentoring or something else.
Reward application, not attendance. Recognize employees who convert learning into improved productivity, quality, innovation, customer experience or business results.
Measure the impact. If learning cannot ultimately demonstrate behavioural or business impact, we need to question the intervention rather than simply celebrate participation numbers.
A strong learning culture exists when employees stop asking, “When is the next training?” and start asking, “What do I need to learn to solve this problem?”
Organizations should stop positioning AI primarily as a technology project and start treating it as a workforce-transformation agenda.
I would approach it through three levels.
First, AI literacy. Every employee should understand what AI can and cannot do, including responsible use, data privacy, accuracy, bias and human oversight.
Second, role-based AI capability. Employees should learn how AI can transform their specific workflows, rather than simply attending generic AI-awareness sessions.
Third, human capability. As AI handles more routine cognitive work, organizations must deliberately strengthen the capabilities that become more valuable: critical thinking, judgement, creativity, collaboration, communication, adaptability, emotional intelligence and ethical decision-making.
The objective should not be “AI replacing people”. It should be “people augmented by AI”.
The organizations that succeed will be those that redesign work intelligently and continuously reskill their workforce alongside that transformation.
I believe L&D needs to move from activity measurement to outcome measurement. Training attendance, completion rates and satisfaction scores are useful operational metrics, but they do not demonstrate business impact. Before launching a learning intervention, I would establish a clear business baseline and define the expected outcome. The chain should be explicit: business problem, capability gap, learning intervention, behaviour change and business outcome. Depending on the intervention, that outcome could be improved productivity, fewer errors, higher sales, lower turnover, stronger succession readiness, improved customer satisfaction or faster time to competence. I would also compare performance before and after the intervention wherever practical and, ideally, use control or comparison groups for major programmes. Ultimately, L&D should be able to answer three questions: What changed? Why did it change? What value did that change create for the business? If we cannot answer those questions, we may have delivered training – but we have not necessarily delivered development.
My advice is simple: do not become the custodian of HR processes; become the architect of organizational capability.
Learn the business before designing the HR solution. Understand the numbers. Understand customers. Understand operations. Understand technology. Then connect people strategy to those realities.
Do not measure HR success by how busy the HR team is. Measure it by whether the organization is becoming more capable, more productive, more resilient and more ready for the future.
And never stop learning yourself.
The future HR leader will not be the person who knows the most HR policies. It will be the person who can connect people, technology, psychology, data and business strategy to create measurable organizational value.
If I could leave the next generation with one principle, it would be this:
“Think like a business leader, understand people like a psychologist, use data like an analyst, embrace technology like an innovator – and lead with humanity.”
© 2026 The Leadership Gazette